Assignment vs. Double Close: What Actually Changes
Once a wholesaler has a property under contract, there are two ways to actually get paid for it: assign the contract to an end buyer, or close on the property yourself and immediately resell it — a double close. Both get the same spread into your pocket. What changes is cost, privacy, and in some cases, whether you're even allowed to do it.
How assignment works
You sign a purchase contract with the seller, then sign a separate assignment agreement transferring your rights and obligations under that contract to an end buyer, in exchange for an assignment fee. Only one closing happens — between the seller and the end buyer — with you stepping out of the transaction at that point.
| You contract with seller | $110,000 |
| Assignment fee | $15,000 |
| End buyer pays, closes with seller | $125,000 |
It's fast and cheap to execute — one closing, one set of title/closing costs, and no financing on your end since you never actually take title. The tradeoff is visibility: depending on the title company and how the paperwork is handled, the seller and end buyer can sometimes both see the assignment fee, which is occasionally a point of friction if a seller feels like they left money on the table.
How a double close works
You close on the purchase from the seller first — actually taking title — then close the resale to the end buyer in a separate transaction, often on the same day or within a day or two. Since most wholesalers don't have the cash to fund the first closing outright, this usually requires transactional funding: a short-term loan that covers the purchase and gets repaid the moment the resale closes, often within hours.
| Closing 1: you buy from seller | $110,000 |
| Closing 2: you sell to end buyer | $125,000 |
| Gross spread | $15,000 |
| Less: transactional funding fee, second set of closing costs | — |
The seller and end buyer never see each other's price — each closing is a standalone sale at its own price. That privacy comes at a cost: two title/escrow bills instead of one, plus a fee for the transactional funding, which together typically run a few thousand dollars more than a straight assignment.
What actually changes between them
- Cost. Assignment is cheaper to execute — one closing, no funding fee. Double closing adds a second closing's costs plus a transactional funding fee, which eats directly into the spread.
- Privacy. Double closing keeps both prices separate; assignment can expose the fee to one or both parties depending on the title company's process.
- Speed and complexity. Assignment is simpler to coordinate — one closing, one closing date. Double closing means lining up two closings and, usually, a transactional lender.
- Whether it's even allowed. Some purchase contracts — particularly bank-owned or agent-listed properties — explicitly prohibit assignment. A double close sidesteps that restriction entirely, since it's structured as two independent, standard sales rather than a transfer of contract rights.
- Licensing requirements. A number of states and municipalities have passed laws that require wholesalers to hold a real estate license, or that otherwise restrict how a contract can be marketed or assigned. These rules vary widely by jurisdiction and change over time, so check current requirements where you're doing business before wholesaling a deal.
Either way, the math is the same starting point
Whichever exit you use, the underlying numbers — the end buyer's max offer, your contract price, and your target spread — are the same inputs. Double closing just adds a line item for the extra closing costs and funding fee that comes out of your net profit.