The 70% Rule for Flipping: A Screen, Not a Guarantee
The 70% rule is the flipper's version of a back-of-napkin filter: don't pay more for a property than 70% of its after-repair value (ARV), minus the rehab budget. It's fast, it's easy to calculate standing in a driveway, and it's meant to leave enough margin to cover holding costs, selling costs, and profit. It's also frequently misunderstood as a guarantee of profitability, which it was never designed to be.
The formula
| After-repair value (ARV) | $285,000 |
| 70% of ARV | $199,500 |
| Rehab budget | $45,000 |
| Max offer (70% rule) | $154,500 |
What the 30% is actually covering
That 30% margin between ARV and your max offer-plus-rehab isn't pure profit — it's absorbing several costs at once:
- Purchase closing costs
- Financing costs during the hold — interest and points on hard money or a rehab loan
- Holding costs — taxes, insurance, utilities for however long the project runs
- Selling costs — agent commission and closing costs, typically 7–10% combined
- Rehab budget overruns, which are close to the rule rather than the exception
- Actual profit, which is whatever's left after all of the above
Laid out that way, it's easy to see why a deal that barely clears the 70% rule with a thin rehab contingency and an optimistic timeline often ends up disappointing — most of that 30% gets absorbed by costs before profit is calculated.
Where a flat 70% breaks down
The rule was popularized in lower-priced, higher-volatility markets. It scales less cleanly at higher price points, because selling costs and holding costs don't grow at the same rate as ARV does:
- Higher-priced flips. A 6% commission on a $700,000 ARV is $42,000 — a much larger absolute number than the same percentage on a $200,000 flip, even though the 70% rule's margin scales with ARV the same way regardless of price point.
- Fast, hot markets. Shorter hold times mean less financing and holding cost to absorb, so some experienced flippers will go above 70% (say 75–78%) when they're confident about a quick resale.
- Slow or uncertain markets. Longer expected time-on-market argues for staying well under 70%, since holding costs and financing costs have more time to accumulate.
Why it's a screen, not an underwriting model
The 70% rule tells you what to offer before you've done full diligence. It's not a substitute for actually itemizing rehab costs, holding costs, and selling costs against your specific numbers — which is what determines real net profit, not just whether the purchase price cleared a screen.